Welcome, Guest | Register or Login

Important Stuff

Jim on Facebook Follow Jim on Twitter

Goodbye Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as feds decide to delist stocks on NYSE

posted on June 17, 2010 at 11:00 am
Bank

Shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, once the giants of the mortgage financing world—plunged yesterday, June 16, on news that the companies’ shares would no longer trade on the New York Stock Exchange. The shares will trade only on the over-the-counter bulletin board system.

The shares have been in danger of delisting since 2008 when federal regulators took over the companies and their stock  prices collapsed. The Federal Housing Finance Agency, which now governs the two companies, instructed them to delist voluntarily after warnings from the New York Stock Exchange that Fannie Mae faced a mandatory delisting since its shares price had averaged less than $1 for the past 30 days.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency could have avoided the delisting by ordering the companies to perform a reverse split wherein, say, 10 shares priced at 56 cents (yesterday’s close for Fannie Mae shares) turn into 1 share worth $5.60. But it’s unlikely that a reserve split would have kept the price above $1 for long and the agency, which is facing the need to come up with a plan to fix these two key players in the mortgage market, has apparently decided that defending the share price of two companies that are currently not viable as public companies sent the wrong signal to the financial markets.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac own or guarantee about 50% of the $11 trillion mortgage market but only an unlimited line of credit from the Federal government has kept the companies alive. Taxpayers now own 80% of the two companies and it’s likely that any final plan will require billions more in taxpayer money (the agency estimates $177 billion) so any restructuring will almost certainly wipe out any remaining private shareholders.

The Obama administration has said that it doesn’t plan to tackle the job of restructuring Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac until 2011.

The biggest short-term effect?

Can taxpayers begin to get off the hook?

posted on March 4, 2010 at 10:00 am
housing

This week’s attempt by the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.) to sell securities backed by residential mortgages and construction loans marks a huge milestone in the road back to normalcy for the financial markets this week. Let’s hope the markets pass the test.

The FDIC has bundled together some of the mortgages and loans it owns after taking over failed banks into a mortgage-backed security of the kind that was the mainstay of the mortgage market before the financial crisis.

That market has been essentially closed for new business since the crisis with only Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) willing to buy these securities with funds provided by taxpayers. Banks use this market to sell mortgages that they have originated so they can put the proceeds back into new mortgages. When this market is frozen, banks have to hold onto the mortgages they’ve originated and that reduces the money they have available for new mortgages. If banks know they can’t securitize and sell their mortgages, they become more reluctant to lend. And that reduces the availability of mortgages.

Because private investors haven’t been willing to buy these securities post-crisis, taxpayers through Fannie Mae and Freddie have been left as the only buyers. That’s been necessary to keep the market functioning at all, but Fannie and Freddie can’t keep expanding their books forever. At some point private investors need to step back into this market.

The mortgage-backed securities that the FDIC will offer for sale this week are designed to entice private investors back into the market.

Household wealth rises and foreclosure rate hits a record–what kind of recovery is this?

posted on December 10, 2009 at 1:58 pm
economic recovery

Put these two headlines together from Bloomberg today and you’ve got a good snapshot of the U.S. economic “recovery” to date.

“U.S. Foreclosures to Reach 3.9 Million in Second Record Year.”

“Household Net Worth in U.S. Increases by $2.67 Trillion.”

Let’s look at the bad new first, okay?

Mortgage deliquency rate projected to inch–and I mean inch–downward in 2010

posted on December 8, 2009 at 2:30 pm
economic recovery

Reassuring news on the home mortgage front: the tide of mortgage delinquencies will start to recede in 2010—unless you live in Arizona, California, Florida, New York or Virginia. Those states will see delinquencies continue to climb next year.

That’s the forecast from TransUnion, the big credit rating company, based on an analysis of credit trends over the last few months.

TransUnion isn’t talking about a big turnaround in the national trend in 2010. Just that mortgage delinquencies will peak in 2010 and then decline slightly.

The mortgage crisis shifts to the FHA and Congress wants to make the problem permanent

posted on November 20, 2009 at 12:10 pm

Another of the “emergency” measures enacted to stop of the financial crisis from plunging the economy into a depression looks like it’s on the road to becoming “permanent.”

And this one could really blow up on us taxpayers—again—not so far down the road.

I’m talking about the “emergency” change in the rules for Federal Housing Administration (FHA) qualified loans that let the agency insure housing loans for as much as $729,000. The temporary change went into effect in two stages in March 2008 and in February 2009. Up until then, the FHA could not insure loans of more than $362,790. That lower limit was in line with the agency’s original mission of helping low-income families who couldn’t make the traditional 20% down payment required by private lenders get a mortgage.

The logic of the higher “temporary” limit was that the FHA would now be able to insure loans in the hard-hit, high-priced housing markets of states like California. The higher limits would enable buyers in these markets to get loans to buy houses that would otherwise sit unsold. The loans would thus support housing prices and the home building industry in high-priced real estate markets.

The FHA has certainly insured lots of loans in these markets. So far in 2009, the agency has insured 107,000 loans in California alone.

Jubak in your Inbox

Email Alerts
RSS feed

Quick Quote

Quotes provided by Yahoo! Finance and are delayed up to 20 minutes.