<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jubak Picks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jubakpicks.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jubakpicks.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:14:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Psst, want to buy a used airline?</title>
		<link>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/12/psst-want-to-buy-a-used-airline/</link>
		<comments>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/12/psst-want-to-buy-a-used-airline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Jubak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leading Indicators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Continental]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jubakpicks.com/?p=3372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why I will never be a momentum investor. Or a trader.
I just can’t bring myself to say “Fundamentals don’t count if the price trend is good enough.”
Continental Airlines (CAL) has come up two of my screens in the last few days as a buy on its price momentum. It came up earlier in mid-September—on September [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/12/psst-want-to-buy-a-used-airline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update Goldcorp (GG)</title>
		<link>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/12/update-goldcorp-gg-2/</link>
		<comments>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/12/update-goldcorp-gg-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Jubak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldcorp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jubakpicks.com/?p=3367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the market close yesterday, March 11, Goldcorp (GG) reported fourth quarter 2009 earnings of 25 cents a share (excluding one-time items). That was in line with the Wall Street consensus. Revenue climbed by 27.8% to $778 million. That was substantially above the $732 million Wall Street estimate.
For the quarter Goldcorp reported production of 601,300 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/12/update-goldcorp-gg-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update Potash of Saskatchewan (POT)</title>
		<link>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/12/update-potash-of-saskatchewan-pot-8/</link>
		<comments>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/12/update-potash-of-saskatchewan-pot-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Jubak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commodities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertilizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Potash of Saskatchewan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jubakpicks.com/?p=3370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Potash of Saskatchewan (POT) has been telling investors for more than a month that it believes that demand is picking up and that prices for potash fertilizer would start to climb in the first quarter of 2010.
I guess the company really meant it.
Yesterday, March 11, after the close of trading Potash raised earnings guidance for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/12/update-potash-of-saskatchewan-pot-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Despite those huge reserves, China could be, gasp, broke</title>
		<link>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/12/despite-those-huge-reserves-china-could-be-gasp-broke/</link>
		<comments>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/12/despite-those-huge-reserves-china-could-be-gasp-broke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Jubak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leading Indicators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global financial crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jubakpicks.com/?p=3363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is China broke?
Seems a silly question right? China’s foreign exchanges reserves stood at $2.4 trillion at the end of 2009. Yes, China announced that its proposed annual budget for 2010 would have a record deficit, but the deficit is just $154 billion or 2.8% of China’s GDP (gross domestic product). By contrast, the U.S. budget [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/12/despite-those-huge-reserves-china-could-be-gasp-broke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With others cutting back on capital spending, ExxonMobil plans to spend more</title>
		<link>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/11/with-others-cutting-back-on-capital-spending-exxonmobil-plans-to-spend-more/</link>
		<comments>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/11/with-others-cutting-back-on-capital-spending-exxonmobil-plans-to-spend-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Jubak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leading Indicators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ExxonMobil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jubakpicks.com/?p=3359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ExxonMobil (XOM) goes its own way. Again.
When oil prices were soaring in 2006 and 2007, ExxonMobil refused to get sucked into a race to see who could spend more on exploration.
Now that everyone else is cutting back on capital budgets (and some companies such as Chevron (CVX) are cutting jobs) ExxonMobil has announced that it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jubakpicks.com/2010/03/11/with-others-cutting-back-on-capital-spending-exxonmobil-plans-to-spend-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
