Welcome, Guest | Register or Login
Jim on Facebook Jim on Twitter Jim's YouTube Channel Jim on Google+

Important Stuff


Stuff Jim Reads

A new and improved Dividend Income portfolio–and three new dividend picks

posted on January 11, 2013 at 8:30 am
Print This Post
stocks up

Wouldn’t ya know it?

Just when dividend investing is getting to be more important—becoming in my opinion the key stock market strategy for the current market environment—it’s also getting to be more difficult to execute with shifting tax rates and special dividends in December 2012 distorting the reported yield on many stocks.

I think there’s really only one real choice—investors have to pull up their socks and work even harder at their dividend investing strategy. That’s why with today’s post I’m revamping the format of the Dividend Income portfolio I’ve run on JubakPicks.com (and it’s precursor on MSN Money and Moneyshow.com) since October 2009. The changes aren’t to the basic strategy. That’s worked well, I think, and I’ll give you some numbers later on so you can judge for yourself. No, the changes are designed to do two things: First, to let you and me track the performance of the portfolio more comprehensively and more easily compare it to the performance turned in by other strategies, and second, to generate a bigger and more frequent roster of dividend picks so that readers, especially readers who suddenly have a need to put more money to work in a dividend strategy, have more dividend choices to work with.

In this post I’m first going to give you a brief explanation for why I think dividend investing is so important right now—and I’m even going to argue that dividend investing might be the single best strategy for this market environment. (And that’s an important argument, in my opinion, since I think this market environment is going to persist for years.)

Then I’m going to lay out the changes in how I’m going to track this portfolio going forward and give you some numbers so you can judge the performance of this portfolio since 2009 and particularly in 2012.

And last I’m going to give you a pick to replace one stock in the current portfolio that has been a disappointment and also two new picks—that’s three picks in all—as part of an expanded dividend portfolio.

So why is dividend investing so important right now in my opinion?

For the last nine months or more, I’ve been writing about what I’ve called the new paranormal market. To catch up if you’ve missed the foundation of this argument see my post from March 2012 http://jubakpicks.com/2012/03/02/call-it-the-new-paranormal-market-youll-need-some-new-investing-tools-but-the-profits-are-out-there/. The premise of my argument is that we’ve entered a period of relatively low returns. Bill Gross, the bond guru at Pimco, calls this period the “new normal” and believes that we’ll be lucky to see average annual returns of 5% a year during this period, which could stretch out for a decade. In my model for the “paranormal market” I’ve added a wrinkle to Gross’s model. Not only will average annual returns be low by the standards of the great bull market that governed the 1980s and 1990s, but also markets will be extraordinarily volatile. So, yes, you might see an average annual return of 5%, but that average will include years of 10% or 15% drops as well as substantial rallies, and it will include years like 2011 when the market will produce a half dozen swings of 7% or more in a month as it did in August. The challenge will be to stay in through the volatility and avoid buying high in moments of market optimism and selling low when everything seems to be headed for ruin—or to find a way to sell more often at market highs and to buy more often at market lows.

Why do I believe that there’s any validity to either Gross’s “new normal” or my “paranormal” market? I’m skeptical of attempts to argue for long-term market trends while we’re in the midst of the action. What seems like a trend can so easily turn out to be just a part of a longer data series pointing in a very different direction. So I’m reluctant to say that just because average returns have been so “modest” and so volatile lately that they must continue that way for some future period. (The cumulative return on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock index is 13.4% for 2012, 27.9% for the last three years, and -2.87% for the last five years.)

What I find convincing about the “new normal” and the “new paranormal” models is the match between the market performance data and the underlying fundamentals of the global financial system. In the last decade or more we’ve seen long term trends—the integration of more countries into the global economy, the rise of new economic powers, big changes in the location of global cash balances and in the direction of global cash flows (as emerging economies emerged and developed economies aged and slowed)—that have challenged the global financial system.

And while the global financial system has survived, by and large, the cost has been huge actions and re-actions by the world’s central banks that have sent waves of cash sloshing across the world. That has led to massive market bubbles created by the overshoot of central bank policies (cheap money and the technology boom and bust, cheap money and the real estate boom and bust, cheap money and the global financial crisis.)

The period has combined falling real returns as globalization increased competitive pressures on bottom lines and as aging stressed global retirement systems with rising volatility as ever expanding central bank balance sheets led to a cycle of booms and crashes. The strongest argument for a period of “new normal” or “paranormal” returns is that the trends that have pushed down returns on capital (globalization and aging) continue to work—and that central banks now face the challenge of supporting the global economy with new cash infusions even as they confront huge balances that require them to exit these markets.

I’d love to see any logic that holds that this is a recipe for steady positive returns.

Why is dividend investing so important in this environment? I’ve laid out the reasons elsewhere but let me recapitulate here. Volatility will create repeated opportunities to capture yields of 5%–the “new normal” and “paranormal” target rate of return–or more as stock prices fall in the newest panic. By using that 5% dividend yield as a target for buys (and sells) dividend investors will avoid the worst of buying high (yields won’t justify the buy) and selling low (yields will argue that this is a time to buy.) And unlike bond payouts, which are fixed by coupon, stock dividends can rise with time, giving investors some protection against inflation.

The challenge in dividend investing during this period is using dividend yield as a guide to buying and selling without becoming totally and exclusively focused on yield. As I argued in my last update to this portfolio on July 3, what continues to matter most is total return. A 5% yield can get wiped out very easily by a relatively small drop in share price. (For more on that argument see my post http://jubakpicks.com/2012/07/03/if-you-want-to-earn-more-dividend-income-youll-have-to-put-up-with-more-volatility-what-you-want-to-avoid-is-a-permanent-impairment-of-capital/ )

The way I have been running the Dividend Income portfolio and tracking it’s performance did, I’m chagrined to admit, emphasize yield and the income from dividends over total return. The stated goal of the portfolio was to beat the yield on the 10-year Treasury with less risk. And each time I reported on the portfolio’s performance I emphasized how much cash the portfolio threw off—and assumed that investors in the portfolio would withdraw that cash rather than reinvest it.

All this had a tendency to de-emphasize total return.

Going forward I’m going to try to fix that. I will continue to report on the cash thrown off by the portfolio—since I recognize that many investors are looking for ways to increase their current cash incomes. But I’m also going to report the total return on the portfolio—so you can compare this performance to other alternatives—and I’m going to assume that an investor will reinvest the cash from these dividend stocks back into other dividend stocks. That will give the portfolio—and investors who follow it—the advantage of compounding over time, one of the biggest strengths in any dividend income strategy.

How to make the transition? I could go back to October 2009, the last time I did a major revision of this portfolio, assume that I reinvested all the dividend cash flow from each of those years into other dividend stocks. That would be especially rewarding if I could put the money each year into the dividend stocks that I now know—with 20/20 hindsight—have done best since 2009 or 2010 or whatever.

That does strike me as cheating, however, for the obvious reasons.

Instead what I’m going to do is to assume I’ve been sitting on the cash generated by the portfolio since October 2009—let’s say I was paralyzed by fear of the market—but that I’ve now been convinced by my own arguments in favor of pursuing a dividend income strategy in this market to put that cash to work. That gives me $29,477 in dividends received since October 2009 to put to work now in new dividend picks that I will add to the portfolio today.

Where does that $29,477 number come from? It’s the total of dividends collected by the picks in the portfolio from October 2009 through December 2012 on what was an original $100,000 investment in October 2009. That comes to a 29.5% payout on that initial investment over a period of 39 months. That’s a compound annual growth rate of 8.27%.

And since we care about total return, how about capital gains or losses from the portfolio? The total equity price value of the portfolio came to $119,958 on December 31, 2012. That’s a gain of $19,958 over 39 months on that initial $100,000 investment or a compound annual growth rate of 5.76%.

The total return on the portfolio for that period comes to $49,435 or a compound annual growth rate of 13.2%.

How does that compare to the total return on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index for that 39-month period? In that period $100,000 invested in the S&P 500 would have grown to $141,468 with price appreciation and dividends included.) That’s a total compounded annual rate of return of 11.26%.

I would point out that these performance numbers for the S&P 500 do have the benefit of real compounding, unlike my Dividend Income portfolio, since each year’s gains or losses on the S&P stocks work off of the gains and losses from the previous year. This is part of the reporting handicap that this revision of the Dividend Income portfolio is designed to close.

But even so an almost 2 percentage point annual advantage to the Dividend Income portfolio isn’t something I’d turn down in this or any other market.

Going forward? I’m going to drop one disappointment from the current portfolio.

Brazilian utility CPFL Energia (CPL) has been clobbered by regulatory changes in the country’s utility sector. The stock is down 16.05% since I added it to the portfolio on September 20, 2011. Just as important, the company has cut its dividend payout this year.

And I’m going to add three positions to the portfolio—one to replace CPFL Energia and two more to soak up the cash that is sitting in the portfolio from past dividend flows. I’ll have more on these three buys when I post each one to the portfolio over the next day or two.

First, I’m going to add Targa Resources Partners (NGLS). The master limited partnership is a member of my Jubak’s Picks portfolio http://jubakpicks.com/the-jubak-picks/. The units pay a 6.81% dividend. Targa has recently acquired its first big foothold in the Bakken formation of North Dakota. The pipeline operator recently raised its target for 2013 adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) by 10% to 15% and kept its projections for distribution growth for 2013 over 2012 at 10% to 12%.

Second, I’m going to add take advantage of depressed oil prices to add shares of ConocoPhillips (COP). The company has one of the strongest portfolios in the liquid-rich Eagle Ford, Permian Basin, and Bakken boom regions. The reserve replacement ratio looks to be over 100% thanks to a $15 billion capital-spending budget. The shares yield 4.51%.

Third, I’m gong to add shares of Intel (INTC), now yielding 4.1%. I’m pretty sure most of you will hate this pick. The stock is down 12.4% in the last 12 months on well-justified fears of the continued slowdown in the PC market as PCs continue to lose share to tablets and smartphones where Intel has a less-than-imposing presence. We are seeing the end of the Wintel duopoly that dominated desktop computing. But you can already see the next transition at Intel taking place with its own small and lower power chips clawing for share in the smartphone and tablet market and the company gradually joining the ranks of the few remaining global foundries that make chips for other chip companies. Intel’s foundry business is currently very small with only three customers as of December, but I think that will change in 2013 and that will start to transform the way investors think of Intel, again.

I’ve got cash in this portfolio to add another pick or two, but I’m going to wait until after the great debt ceiling battle is over and it’s clearer to me how the market is going to break in the first half of 2013. Even in dividend stocks—or maybe especially with dividend stocks—it’s good to look for bargains.

Full disclosure: I don’t own shares of any of the companies mentioned in this post in my personal portfolio. The mutual fund I manage, Jubak Global Equity Fund http://jubakfund.com/ , may or may not now own positions in any stock mentioned in this post. The fund did not own shares of any stock mentioned in this post as of the end of September. For a full list of the stocks in the fund as of the end of September see the fund’s portfolio at http://jubakfund.com/about-the-fund/holdings/

Related Posts

No related posts.


  • juday3 on 11 January 2013

    I actually love the INTC choice. I picked up some shares a couple weeks ago and will continue adding to the position on any pullback

  • georic on 11 January 2013

    Jim, another instance where you publish your text here, prior to the paying blog.
    Re INTC, I have had the share on my radar for a month, not daring to pull the trigger. With your astounding achievements in this field (BRCM, QCOM, AAPL and even NOK) you have however shown a flair for tech equities which I have to acknowledge.

  • Jim Jubak on 11 January 2013

    Georic, this post was scheduled for 10:30 last night on JAM. If it didn’t go out on that schedule, I don’t know why it didn’t. It’s certainly posted there now with a 10:30 time stamp.

  • greedibanks on 11 January 2013

    For me things like the timing of posts is not so important. But the overall perf of Jubax Fund is much more so. It’s always tough to know just when one should make a judgement on a fund performance, but after 2 plus years in Jubax Fund I decided it just is not producing the kind of returns expected, by my metrics anyway, so I have redeemed shares. Good luck to others.

  • chapmame on 11 January 2013

    Greedibanks, I would recommend using any redemption on emerging markets, as Jim’s fund primarily does, otherwise I have a feeling you will be selling low. Honestly, I think Jim’s fund has mainly suffered from bad timing, which IMO, is about to change

  • sdchris on 11 January 2013

    I like INTC and think they will transition to the mobile market enough to put off the losses from PC sales. One thing people forget is that mobile requires a huge server network. INTC is already dominating chip sales in the server market and will continue to do so in the future. I can’t comment on the other two stocks, but I will follow them and see how they do after this debt crisis.

  • Jim Jubak on 11 January 2013

    Greedibanks, no idea what your metrics are and sorry that the fund has disappointed. JUBAX was up 9.42% in 2012, for what that’s worth. Just for my own interest where do you think you’ll put your money now?

  • eremmell on 11 January 2013

    I’m not expecting significant changes at INTC … but it seems near its low currently, and it does pay a good divi. I’m tracking it, perhaps I’ll get in when it goes lower. I’m looking very closely at CLF, will probably buy that instead after they announce Q4 earnings. The oil stocks seem expensive to me currently.

  • KSperryM on 11 January 2013

    Since most of our investments are in tax-sheltered accounts (IRAs and Roths), I’d really appreciate a comment about the suitability of your recommendations for such accounts. I’m particularly interested in the amounts that will be withheld as foreign taxes and thus not be recovered by an IRA investor.

  • rickscott on 12 January 2013

    As you are measuring the return in USD what has been the Purchasing Power of USD during this time.

  • svennader on 13 January 2013

    What are the consequences of purchasing Targa (NGLS) in a Vanguard Roth IRA?

  • cjxland on 14 January 2013

    KSperryM- it is true that div taxes w/held are not recoverable for stocks in IRAs; as Jim sez, you really have to do yer homework here. The company website will give you the real dividend distribution, but it may not be in USD. Other fionancial sites are frequently wrong.

    Two easy ways around the dividend tax proiblem:

    First- simply discount the stated dividend by whatever the w/holding is; that is your real return. Buy the stock when that real yield appeals [advantage- you will be buying lower].

    Ex: France charges a 30% dividend tax- multiply any stated dividend by .70, that is what you really will get paid. On TOT, SNY, f’rinstance- not 6% but actaul 4.2% yield.

    Second- buy stocks of conpanies located in countries that charge zero tax on dividends, or have an agreement with the US to that purpose.
    The best info I’ve seen on the subject- but may be a bit out of date:


    I’ve learned two things in dividend investing- do yer homework and be very very patient.

    [thanks for another great article Jim!

  • cjxland on 14 January 2013

    svennader- purchasing any Limited Partnership [you are then one of the Ltd. Partners] results in receiving a Schedule K-1 from the company [not necessarily at tax time!]; this wonderful document may be the most gobbledy-gooky of all the IRS gg, on first look.

    However, it isn’t too hard to figure out, and if you are not making tons of money from yer LPs and MLPs and just Ps investments, you may be able to ignore it completely. My CPA just laughs and throws mine in the circular file…[I think because she sees humour in chump-change investing]. There are stipulated earnings limits…

    However, however- depending on yer particular circumstances there can be strange [unintended!] tax consequeneces including triggering AMT treatment, so be careful who you pick for a CPA and go wtih a pro, on this.

    Tons of info on the internet, IRS, if you must DYI…and K-1 does come with Instructions.

    Usually Jim has a tax-pro reader or two that can offer better- more actionable- insight on this subject…??

  • cjxland on 14 January 2013

    Jim- one other important consideration for a dividend portfolio is growth of those dividends over the years. INTC and COP are both excellent choices in this regard- 10+% annually for Conoco, almost 13% for Intel, over last 5 years. For stocks paying 4.5% dividend today, that growth translates to 7.25% yield for COP and over 8.25% yield for INTC in 5 years, on yer original investment [assuming they can keep up those increases- good strong well-managed companies usually can, and do.]

    And one more, since dividend investing implies long-term outlook, is your favorite metric for that: ROIC. Again, INTC and COP are looking good here, above 15% [COP improving quickly after shedding all those gas stations...?]

    Fiuther compounding by reinvesting pushes these yields on cost much higher, as you note.

    [Should note that div growth and ROIC don't really apply as much to MLPs, on account of their tax structure.]

Post a comment

You need to login in order to post a comment.

Comments that include profanity, or personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming" or "trolling," or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Jubak in your Inbox

Get Email Alerts

Sign up now and download Jim's latest Special Report

Get the RSS feed

Quick Quote

Quotes provided by Yahoo! Finance and are delayed up to 20 minutes.