Welcome, Guest | Register or Login
Jim on Facebook Jim on Twitter Jim's YouTube Channel Jim on Google+

Hot Topics

Important Stuff


Stuff Jim Reads

How to worry–and when–in 2010

posted on February 16, 2010 at 12:50 pm
Print This Post
economic recovery

This is my fourth take on how to worry in less than six months.

I wrote the first one in October when the Dow Jones Industrial Average had poked its head above 10,000 for the first time in a year (and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index was just about to kiss 1100.)

Now I’m posting on the topic just days after the Dow Industrials touched 10,000 again—but this time headed in the other direction. The Dow Jones Average closed at 9908 on February 8.

In October and November (when I reposted the original) the worry was that the stock market had gone up too far, too fast and was ready for a fall. In January and now in February the worry is that the long-feared decline has finally arrived. And it’s going to turn out to be a lot worse than the correction that everyone watching stocks go straight up from the March low had been waiting for. Or at least that’s the fear.

All this “how to worry”  history tells you something about how tough the last four to five months have been on investors who have been through two bear markets in less than ten years now—and are justifiably now inclined to jump at every bit of news good or bad.

Jumping at every bit of news is actually not bad behavior. The lesson of the last decade is that investors can easily get too complacent.

What’s the saying? You’re not paranoid if they really are out to get you?

I just came back from an investment conference in Orlando where I heard a number of speakers—no names but you know who you are—proclaim that the 60% rally off the March bottom proves that Buy and Hold is alive and well. Well, frankly, I think all that remark proves is that complacency is alive and well even after two bear markets have left many Buy and Hold investors looking up at 0% for the decade.

No, being jumpier than a cat on Mott Street during the Lunar New Year isn’t a bad thing. Since the real world right now is full of contradictory trends that each seem to take control of the market for just a week or two at a time, all that being jumpy right now proves is that you’re paying attention.

That doesn’t mean, however, that you want to act every time a bit of news sends you twitching. The challenge now is to pay attention as you should—but to separate the real worries that you need to act on from the day to day flow of noise. If you act on every bit of noise that causes a moment’s worry, you’ll do a good job of turning your portfolio into a profit center for your on-line or wetware broker. But you won’t be doing your own returns any favor.

If you want a good example of exactly how twitchy the news is look at my three posts from February 10 on the Greek crisis. At 11:48 I posted “Just a euro bounce on rumors”  http://jubakpicks.com/2010/02/09/just-a-euro-bounce/ . At 12:25 I posted “Euro rumors get more concrete” http://jubakpicks.com/2010/02/09/euro-rumors-get-more-concrete/ . And at 1 p.m. I posted “Euro rumors get less concrete” http://jubakpicks.com/2010/02/09/euro-rumors-get-less-concrete/ .

I hope everyone got the point that my increasingly silly headlines were supposed to convey: You shouldn’t act by buying and selling on every twitch in the rumor mill.

That still leaves us all with an important question: If some of this news is just noise (and not worth acting on) and some is important in the real world (and worth acting on), then how do we tell the difference?

And that’s where my “How to worry” list of what’s real world important to worry about and when comes in.

By listing the potential turning points in the stock market over the remainder of 2010, “How to worry” indicates what news might be worth acting on because it has a good chance of moving stock prices for more than a day or two or three because that news is part of a real long-term worry for the market.

The goal is to put together a list that tells you 1) what the chances are that something will go wrong, 2) how bad it might be if something did go wrong, and 3) when things might go wrong.

Here’s my current list of worries and the timetable they are running on.

  1. The leaders of the European Union will fumble about issuing empty promises to support Greece in its budget crisis before cobbling together a “solution” that makes bond holders just happy enough and removes the threat now hanging over European banks outside of Greece that are holding Greek sovereign and bank debt. I wrote about the crisis and its limits in two posts on February 8: http://jubakpicks.com/2010/02/08/reassuring-talk-isnt-ending-the-euro-crisis/ and http://jubakpicks.com/2010/02/08/the-euro-crisis-isnt-a-global-crisis-yet/. The most likely outcome, now that it’s clear to everyone exactly how reluctant (BIG TIME reluctant) the German government is to get into the guarantee business and dent the country’s AAA reputation for fiscal conservatism, is something that will turn a boiling crisis into a simmering problem. I don’t think this is going away anytime soon. “Fixing” Greece, whatever that means, will still leave the European Union with a list of problems that starts with Portugal and doesn’t end with Spain. But unless the Germans do something that is currently unimaginable and pull out of the Euro, this is a European crisis that in economic terms is limited to countries on the periphery of the European Union. In currency terms a continuing euro crisis will lead to a stronger U.S. dollar.
  2. China’s National People’s Congress begins on March 5. If China is going to officially change monetary policy or shift more spending to domestic consumption, it’s likely that the new policy will be announced as a result of this meeting. The big policy issues for China’s stock market this year all concern cheap money. March could see the government announce that it will raise interest rates. (China’s central bank generally tries everything else first and changes interest rates only as last resort. Hence the recent spate of increases in bank reserve requirements. An actual interest rate increase would be a signal of a real change in policy.) That would push down stock prices in general and push down the share prices of real estate developers and many industrial companies especially hard. The other big policy question is whether the government will do something to change its rather toothless system for setting lending targets for banks and institute a system that enforces more binding targets. That would also send China’s stocks tumbling. I think the odds are that the government won’t do anything very dramatic at this meeting. Officials won’t have final numbers on first quarter GDP growth and will still be studying how lending moratoriums enacted in late January have slowed growth. I’d expect an announcement of a loan target for the year –that banks will be free to ignore as usual—some more moves to equalize growth and to support the consumer economy—and promises to fight speculation, but I don’t think Beijing is yet ready to rock its own economic boat at this meeting. For more on why the command economy can’t always get what it wants (although it usually gets what it needs) see my post http://jubakpicks.com/2010/01/28/the-rout-in-global-stocks-is-a-tempest-in-the-teapot-of-chinas-command-economy/.
  3. Near the end of April investors will get the first official numbers on how fast the U.S. and Chinese economies grew in the first three months of the year. For the United States, the worry is that the data will show growth slowing significantly from the 5.7% growth recorded (according to first estimates) in the fourth quarter of 2009. Everybody expects that growth will slow as the recovery moves along and as the effects of the February 2009 stimulus package wear off, but too big a drop will reignite fears that the recovery hasn’t become self sustaining and that the United States could tumble back into a recession. Officials in Beijing will be studying the first quarter numbers to see if they stepped on the brakes too hard or too softly by restricting bank lending in January. A repeat of the fourth quarter’s 10.7% growth would be a disappointment since it would almost certainly mean that the government would have to restrict the money supply. (The odds of an interest rate increase would go up—and stocks would go down.) A number too far below 10.7% would indicate that the government had over-re-acted and signals a likely return to looser money. Investors, economists and government officials will all be looking at March data such as the February jobs numbers that the United States reports in the first week of March for clues on how GDP growth will go.
  4. By the time the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee meets on April 27 through 28, its members will know what the GDP numbers say about the first quarter, even if the public doesn’t. The April 28 second day policy statement might then include new language that will indicate an interest rate increase sooner rather than later. The next meeting—on June 23 through 23—is an even more likely candidate for a change in language. But any change won’t be a big change. Fed chairman Ben Bernanke’s testimony to the House Financial Services Committee last week made it clear that when the Fed finally does move, its first moves will be to raise the interest it pays to banks for money kept on deposit at Federal Reserve banks and perhaps a nudge in the short-term target rate of a quarter of a point. Any move will take a bit of wind out of the market’s sails but the big increases that investors fear are an issue for 2011 and not 2010.
  5. Central banks from India to Brazil are clearly thinking about raising interest rates in 2010. The Reserve Bank of India, for example, has done all the preparation for a rate increase. But these increases play out differently than in the United States. These increases, when they come, will be in economies that are growing so fast that inflation has become a real danger—and not, as in the United States in an economy growing so slowly that a tiny increase in interest rates could put the recovery at risk. Interest rate increases in Brazil or India or Australia or wherever will strengthen those currencies against the U.S. dollar. Once these rate increases start the currency market will be treated to a U.S. dollar that’s rising against the euro and the pound but falling against the real and the Australian dollar to the degree that U.S. interest rate increases lag rate increases in those economies.
  6. The U.S. banking system still isn’t out of the woods and in fact faces a need to raise new capital in the second half of 2010. Mortgage foreclosure filings climbed 15% in January from January 2009. And bank seizures of homes could rise to a record 3 million in 2010, according to RealtyTrac. Studies show that once the value of a house falls below what the owner owes on a mortgage the likelihood of foreclosure increase. More than 20% of U.S. home owners had negative equity in the fourth quarter of 2009, according to RealtyTrac. Much of the risk in the mortgage market has been shifted from bank balance sheets to taxpayers through Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE). These wards of U.S. taxpayers will wind up holding the bag if foreclosures surge. But bank portfolios have their own big problems. Regional and local banks could blow up on problems with their commercial real estate loans. I wrote about this in a post on October 8 http://jubakpicks.com/2009/10/08/will-bad-commercial-real-estate-loans-set-off-banking-crisis-ii/. More than 800 banks in the United States have more than half their total loan portfolios committed to loans to local real-estate developers, builders, and businesses. Loan losses reported by the big regional banks for the fourth quarter have actually come down slightly but the improvement isn’t enough to make a trend especially if economic growth slows in the second half of the year.
  7. Earnings growth could be less than now expected. I think this is a danger more for the second half of 2010 than the first. As I wrote in my January 22 post http://jubakpicks.com/2010/01/22/2010-well-the-first-half-anyway-looks-good-for-stocks-despite-the-current-correction/ watch what happens as 2010 moves along. To see why look at the pattern that earnings growth makes as we come off the bottom of the Great Recession. In the first quarter of 2010 projections call for Standard & Poor’s 500 operating earnings of $17.12, up from $10.11 in the first quarter of 2009. That’s 69% earnings growth year to year. Second quarter 2010 operating earnings are projected at $18.59, up from $13.01 in the second quarter of 2009. That’s 43% earnings growth year to year. Third quarter 2010 earnings are projected at $19.92, up from $15.78 in the third quarter of 2009. That’s 26% earnings growth year to year. See the pattern here? As stocks move further and further away from the economic bottom in earnings at the end of 2008, year to year earnings growth slows because the year earlier quarter wasn’t quite so horrible. That makes spectacular earnings growth pretty easy to come by in the first half of 2010 and makes earnings growth in the second half of the year look increasingly ordinary. (Especially if stocks have kept moving up in price quarter by quarter.) So the odds that stocks will deliver the earnings needed to justify higher share prices look pretty good in the first half of 2010 and then decline as the second half progresses.
  8. Slowing economic growth remains the big worry in 2010. It’s the one worry, that if worry turned into reality, could make all of the other seven worries in this list much, much worse. And it’s the only one that could work to combine some of these discrete worries into a much bigger crisis—again. Unfortunately, I can’t discount—although I think it’s unlikely–the possibility that the world’s developed economies, including the United States will lead the globe back into a painful slowdown at the end of 2010 and in early 2011. The European Union could very well still be wallowing in crisis then. The effects of the U.S. stimulus package will be wearing off and with the U.S. Senate unable to pass any legislation at all the United States could go into the second half of 2010 without a budget for fiscal 2011, let alone a second jobs bill. (The United Kingdom could still be trying to cobble together a government after a dead heat election in May.) Doesn’t have to happen mind you. But the possibility is real.

So what does my list of worries tell you? Four things I think.

First, that 2010 is going to be one tough year for investors to make a buck. Volatility will be high. Trends won’t last long. Emotions will drive the crowd from euphoria to panic in a matter of days. It will be a time to take profits when you have them, to control losses, and to not fall in love with any stock or sector.

Second, that developing markets look like a better bet for 2010 than do the developed markets of the Europe, Japan, and the United States. Economic growth will be higher. Debt overhangs are lower. And political problems seem more manageable. Developing economies won’t grow like gangbusters if developed economies falter but they will do better by investors especially if they buy in on a dip at relatively reasonable valuations.

Third, that the weeks from now through April will be incredibly volatile as investors ping pong from one crisis and uncertainty to another. But the real danger in this period is relatively low. China isn’t going to kill its economic growth. The Federal Reserve isn’t going to raise interest rates by two percentage points. The real danger remains in the second half of the year when developed economies stand a real chance at slipping back toward, if not into, recession.

And fourth, that the end of the dollar carry trade, which had been crucial to the rally in commodity prices and commodity currencies in 2009 isn’t on my list any more. Borrowing a cheap and falling U.S. dollar in order to invest in commodities or stocks in emerging markets or whatever isn’t that attractive e anymore mostly because the dollar has rallied and could continue to do so for a while. But the Japanese yen looks more than capable of picking up the slack. So I’m not especially worried any longer about the effect of an end to the dollar carry trade on commodity prices.

Looking at this list, investors certainly can’t relax in the first half of 2010. But it’s the second half of the year that I’m really worried about.

Related Posts

No related posts.


  • EdMcGon on 16 February 2010

    You’re ignoring the 800-pound gorilla/news story in the room: Iran. If the country with the world’s second largest oil reserves is attacked (whether by the U.S. or Israel), don’t you think there will be an extreme market reaction? At the very least, expect oil prices to spike. Worst case scenario is the equity markets enter a free-fall until the “war” with Iran is clearly over (although oil companies should do well).

    Considering even the Saudis are calling for more “immediate” actions than sanctions, it seems like only a matter of time.

  • dmartin11 on 16 February 2010

    Thanks for the update Jim. These are the articles that help me the most, to understand what moves the market and when. As you mentioned yesterday in your 4th Quarter tally, the market IS hard to predict, but I like to hear your best take on what might happen!

  • DJBarber on 16 February 2010

    Brazil May Tax Ore Exports, Seek More Steel Plants (Update2)


  • DJBarber on 16 February 2010

    Speaking of worrying. . .

    TC seems to repeatedly have trouble holding any kinds of gains lately.

    People seem to be selling into any kind of strength.

    Considering that Moly prices HAVE been rising, Iron Ore sales HAVE been rising, any ideas on why TC seems like a laggard here?
    The only reason I can think of is that people expect them to report lower production or much higher price to dig it.
    Typically when I am at a loss as to why a particular holding lags behind the market, I don’t do anything, expecting the market to catch up (Eventually.)
    But this feels different . . . When everything seems to be in place (Rising Iron ore sales, rising Moly prices, increasing demand, etc..) I would expect the stock price of TC to do much better than it has.
    (Well OK, last year it was up 300+% from its lows, so I guess people could just be waiting to see REAL demand, and a REAL recovery??…)
    It is scheduled to report on market close 2/25, is there anything that would make you think of getting rid of this stock?

  • EdMcGon on 16 February 2010

    Brazil loves Vale! Telling them they need to manufacture steel in addition to mining iron ore?

    While Vale has growth potential, no business turns from mining to manufacturing overnight. It could be years before Vale sees any profits from steel manufacturing, if they even attempt it. In the meantime, they’ll end up pouring money into building steel plants to avoid paying higher taxes on exported iron ore?

    On top of all that, their financials aren’t stellar either. And with a P/E of 46, I’d like a bit more near-term growth than some steel “pipe dream” that may never happen.

  • DJBarber on 16 February 2010

    Wasn’t talking about vale, was talking about the taxes. Any takes on exporting Iron ore from Brazil makes Australia Iron ore cheaper.. And makes the Chinese uneasy about where spot prices are going, and adds pressure to the yearly ORE price negotiations.
    Not talking about BHP either..
    Can you guess yet? I know Jim can…

    Of course the company I’m talking about has its own problems…..

  • DJBarber on 16 February 2010

    Correction from last post
    (Should have read)
    “Any taxes on exporting Iron ore from Brazil makes Australia Iron ore cheaper”

  • sigli on 16 February 2010

    We call this market ‘Katy Perry’ —

    “You change your mind like a girl changes clothes…

    ‘Cause you’re hot and you’re cold
    You’re yes and you’re no
    You’re in and you’re out
    You’re up and you’re down

    You’re wrong when it’s right
    You’re black and it’s white
    We fight, we break up
    We hug, we make up”

    That about sums up this market. But I like to see Katy Perry is back. Volatility is ooh so much fun!

  • Jim Jubak on 16 February 2010

    EdMc, I’m not ignoring the possibility of war with Iran. Just not worrying too much about it because (1) its just a bout impossible to handicap and (2) it’s not as huge long-term market event. Sure everything wouild go nuts for a while but oil producers coiuld make up for Iranian production in a matter of months and I douibt that the U.S. would face any real boycott from Arab oil producers. They don’t have any real love for the Iranians and the more conservative Arab regimes are actually very afraid of them and wouldn’t mind seeing them cut down to size. At least that’s my take. You got a different one?

  • EdMcGon on 16 February 2010

    Nope. You are correct on that, and I’ll add the Saudis basically gave the green light to immediate action against Iran. Do you suppose they smell future profits to be made?

    I would add an outside possibility of a long term war if Iran decides to retaliate. Keep in mind the Iranians have a larger army than Saddam’s Iraq did. If Iran were to try something in Iraq or Afghanistan (or even Israel), it could get ugly over there.

  • YX on 16 February 2010

    Jim and Ed:
    Now we wish Saddam is there to contain Iran! He was the only strong man there. But I am sick tired of war for oil, particularly the war for the oil-rich Arab countries.

  • YX on 16 February 2010

    War with Iran maybe more costly than Iraq. America is not in any position to have more wars.

  • alexzhu on 16 February 2010

    Ed I doubt the war is realistic. Maybe after years, but not near term.

  • EdMcGon on 16 February 2010

    The Saudis disagree with you. They think something needs to be done immediately. Does that mean anything will be done? Hard to say, but I suspect the Israelis won’t wait beyond this year to attempt something, assuming the U.S. doesn’t do anything.

    I agree. But let me ask you: What would happen to our economy if oil were to shoot overnight to, hypothetically, $200/barrell?

    While that makes a great argument for alternative energy sources, that doesn’t help us now.

    As for the cost of the war, I agree with you there too. But a nuclear Iran is a far more dangerous prospect than Saddam ever was. Ironically, your comment about Saddam was right on the money. But that’s one of those “if we knew then what we know now” deals.

  • rosemanjhk on 16 February 2010

    @DJ -

    Are you talking FSUMF? I sold both that and TC when they peaked last month for VERY nice profits. I think market fundementals seem to be contributing less to a stock’s price than politics and news and even “gut” reaction these days…

    And as for Iran, I see the US pursuing more of a support the dissidents policy, trying to foment revolution internally. Sound familiar?

  • DJBarber on 16 February 2010

    DING DING DING FSUMF is the correct answer!

    I still hold it, didn’t agree with The sell out of JJ picks (Which was a first for me, I am glad I still hold it, I believe it will easily make Jims initial 5$ target by March) and look for 7- 8.75 by December (If they are on schedule with expansion, If they manage to sell to at least two additional companies outside of China, and if Ore contract prices rise by 50 -70%, and IF they expand and sell every last ounce of the expansion on the spot market, and IF they can continue to keep production costs DOWN)

    Iran? I posted several 3 – 4 months ago that I believed somebody (not the US) would be investing (And by investing I don’t mean investing) in their nuke facilities very soon. I still believe they may be a wild card, but I am with Jim, won’t affect the market very long, but could hold substantial problems for Iraq, and embolden Hezbolah, And Israel is just looking for an excuse to go into Lebanon again, kill two birds with one stone as it were. . .

  • bsdgv on 16 February 2010

    Unemployment is a lagging indicator but these unemployment numbers are about the future:

    Layoffs Continue to Mount


  • Run26.2 on 16 February 2010

    I don’t expect much sympathy for Iran in the muslim world since they are one of the few majority Shiite countries. The Saudis would probably like to see them taken down a peg to quiet their Shia minority population. And Iraq is not really in a position to help at the moment. I don’t know if the dissidents would welcome us, but they would not mind an overthrow of the Theocracy. If you listen to those that have recently traveled to Iran, there is not a lot of support for the leadership or their views towards the west.

  • YX on 16 February 2010

    You said don’t fall in love with any stock or sector. Does it also apply to country? Such as BRF….

  • nukeage on 17 February 2010

    THANK YOU, Jim! There is indeed a LOT to worry about . . .

  • rosemanjhk on 17 February 2010

    @DJ -

    IF you were a short term trader (and I am usually long by at least a year for tax purposes) I think you could make a lot of money riding the TC and FSUMF roller coasters. They seem to have a problem breaking through the $15 and $5 (about, respectively) price levels, and then have a 20-25% correction. The correction happens very fast, and then it takes months to build back up to those levels, and then bang – they drop again. At least ove the last year or so that seems to be what they have been doing….I think they are both good stocks, but I just lost my patience with them, and needed some $ to buy BRK.B with. And that is an awful lot of “IF’s” for FSUMF you mention there…..

Post a comment

You need to login in order to post a comment.

Comments that include profanity, or personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming" or "trolling," or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Jubak in your Inbox

Get Email Alerts

Sign up now and download Jim's latest Special Report

Get the RSS feed

Quick Quote

Quotes provided by Yahoo! Finance and are delayed up to 20 minutes.