Welcome, Guest | Register or Login
Jim on Facebook Follow Jim on Twitter

Important Stuff

Archives

Stuff Jim Reads

Tomorrow’s GDP number likely to move the market but up or down?

posted on January 28, 2010 at 3:42 pm
Print This Post
economic recovery

 When you’re making up your list of market-moving events, don’t forget tomorrow’s (January 29) release of the first take on fourth quarter U.S. GDP (gross domestic product). Economists are looking for strong 4.6% growth in the U.S. economy to end the year.

 Anything less would be a market-moving disappointment. Anything more, as I read the way the numbers are being framed on Wall Street, would only be moderately reassuring since the consensus view is that the economy is set to slow in 2010 from the fourth quarter growth rate.

Still, those of us who are long stocks would certainly prefer that GDP growth come in at 4.6% or better. (The Bureau of Economic Analysis is scheduled to release the data before the stock market opens at 8:30 ET tomorrow morning.)

So what are the signs? The numbers in today’s release on U.S. durable goods (stuff that lasts a while and isn’t destroyed by use such as cars, washing machines, and air planes) orders were a mixed bag. Durable goods orders increased 0.3% in December but the consensus was looking for a 2% increase. Excluding transportation goods, orders jumped 0.9%. The consensus was looking for a 0.5% increase.

 Shipments were up 2.9% in December. That’s usually a positive indicator for GDP growth. New orders for nondefense capital goods (excluding aircraft) climbed 1.3% in the month. Rising orders for capital goods usually reflect rising business investment. The 1.3% increase in December comers on up of a 3.1% increase in November.

A good-sized increase in business investment would be a sign that companies are seeing signs of a pickup in their business in 2010. And when capital goods investment rises, increase hiring usually isn’t that far behind.

Related Posts

No related posts.

9 comments

  • DJBarber on 28 January 2010

    I am guessing that we will start up, then rumors of greece default will bring us down, then back up, then back down, then up again. China will then say that they will be tightening some more, and the market will go down. Then back up….
    (Really just wanted to see if I could post….)

  • EdMcGon on 28 January 2010

    DJ shoots, AND SCORES!

    Speaking of sports analogies, I would be betting the “under” on that 4.6% number. I think we’ve seen enough earnings reports to know that gross sales were down overall for the quarter as a whole.

    Although I’ll be happy to be wrong.

  • dflynn1162 on 28 January 2010

    In last nights SOTU address, Obama said he wanted us to be better at exporting goods (I think that’s what he said). If so, does this mean that he will back a monetary policy of a cheaper dollar? If so, does this mean gold will go up?

  • EdMcGon on 28 January 2010

    dflynn,
    You bring up an interesting contrast in two of the things the president said. If he wants a cheaper dollar, all he has to do is keep spending like Imelda Marcos in a shoe store. However, he said he wants to limit spending (yeah I know, I don’t believe it either!).

    Since the government has yet to do anything to improve our ability to export (I think we have had trade deficits at least since the 80′s), I don’t really put much faith in Obama to change decades of government incompetence in this area.

    Regarding gold, as long as the Fed keeps blowing bubbles, gold might have a roller coaster ride.

  • KenBest on 28 January 2010

    I am afraid the only export this administration is going
    to double in the next 5 years is the jobs market….

  • YX on 28 January 2010

    See I told so. Last night’s speech was nothing.

  • SPDTANIA on 29 January 2010

    Starting with Obama and down to each senator and congressman, their only interest is the upcoming election. It is all posturing and every idea is half baked and ill formed. Nothing that they have done is ever well thought, efficient or complete. Atleast the fed acted with conviction.

    Tax the banks at this juncture?!! First lend them money at 0% so they can lend. But why lend – when defaults are at their peak. So beg and cajole them to increase lending, then ask then to increase the capital ratios. Then decide to tax them even more!! – because the basket cases like GM and AIG cant pay back their TARP. Hey, make up your mind, how you want to help this economy or is everything all about getting elected?

  • bobisgreen on 29 January 2010

    Well…3 for 3 1. Bernanke 2. State of Union speach (I think that was one of them) 3. GDP. We’ll see if this Friday’s pre-market voo doo takes hold of the traders & investors.

  • doydum on 29 January 2010

    > Tomorrow’s GDP number likely to move the market but up or down?

    Nowhere.

Post a comment

You need to login in order to post a comment.
 

Comments that include profanity, or personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming" or "trolling," or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.



Jubak in your Inbox

Get Email Alerts

Sign up now and download Jim's latest Special Report

Get the RSS feed

Quick Quote

Quotes provided by Yahoo! Finance and are delayed up to 20 minutes.