<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stocks and bonds take away different messsage from the Fed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jubakpicks.com/2009/11/04/stocks-and-bonds-take-away-different-messsage-from-the-fed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jubakpicks.com/2009/11/04/stocks-and-bonds-take-away-different-messsage-from-the-fed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 20:47:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Jubak</title>
		<link>http://jubakpicks.com/2009/11/04/stocks-and-bonds-take-away-different-messsage-from-the-fed/comment-page-1/#comment-1680</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Jubak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jubakpicks.com/?p=2038#comment-1680</guid>
		<description>Anytime a buyer--in this case the Fed--walks away from a market prices in that market go down. That&#039;s what bond traders and bank stock analysts didn&#039;t like about the Fed&#039;s language on agency debt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anytime a buyer&#8211;in this case the Fed&#8211;walks away from a market prices in that market go down. That&#8217;s what bond traders and bank stock analysts didn&#8217;t like about the Fed&#8217;s language on agency debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cgegax</title>
		<link>http://jubakpicks.com/2009/11/04/stocks-and-bonds-take-away-different-messsage-from-the-fed/comment-page-1/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>cgegax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jubakpicks.com/?p=2038#comment-1660</guid>
		<description>In the Fed&#039;s statement about lowering their purchases, they said, &quot;The amount of agency debt purchases, while somewhat less than the previously announced maximum of $200 billion, is consistent with the recent path of purchases and reflects the limited availability of agency debt.&quot;  Sound to me like they put up $200B but there just wasn&#039;t that much to buy, so they are lowering it.  Whether that&#039;s the result of agencies producing less volume or other investors buying more of it is not clear.  The former would be bad news for banks.  The latter would be a sign of things getting back to normal, which should be a good thing in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Fed&#8217;s statement about lowering their purchases, they said, &#8220;The amount of agency debt purchases, while somewhat less than the previously announced maximum of $200 billion, is consistent with the recent path of purchases and reflects the limited availability of agency debt.&#8221;  Sound to me like they put up $200B but there just wasn&#8217;t that much to buy, so they are lowering it.  Whether that&#8217;s the result of agencies producing less volume or other investors buying more of it is not clear.  The former would be bad news for banks.  The latter would be a sign of things getting back to normal, which should be a good thing in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/10 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 330/330 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: static.jubakpicks.com

Served from: jubakpicks.com @ 2012-05-22 07:07:46 -->
