<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The natural gas glut: winners and losers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jubakpicks.com/2009/07/16/369/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jubakpicks.com/2009/07/16/369/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 02:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Jubak</title>
		<link>http://jubakpicks.com/2009/07/16/369/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Jubak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jubakpicks.com/?p=369#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a couiple of pipeline partnerships in my two portfolios. Check out ECA, EEP, ENB, ETP. Some are common stock, others with higher yields are master limited partnerships.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a couiple of pipeline partnerships in my two portfolios. Check out ECA, EEP, ENB, ETP. Some are common stock, others with higher yields are master limited partnerships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soonerxii</title>
		<link>http://jubakpicks.com/2009/07/16/369/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Soonerxii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jubakpicks.com/?p=369#comment-43</guid>
		<description>If we don&#039;t have a hurricane that disrupts the gulf this season, nat gas will test something in the mid 2 dollar range, imo.  
but long term, I suspect that we will have policy change that catapults nat gas in respect to demand, and consequently price action.  If Obama is really serious about being green, then nat gas is the only near and medium term solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we don&#8217;t have a hurricane that disrupts the gulf this season, nat gas will test something in the mid 2 dollar range, imo.<br />
but long term, I suspect that we will have policy change that catapults nat gas in respect to demand, and consequently price action.  If Obama is really serious about being green, then nat gas is the only near and medium term solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Algalli</title>
		<link>http://jubakpicks.com/2009/07/16/369/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Algalli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jubakpicks.com/?p=369#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Jim
How about the pipeline companies that transport natural gas. I would think a plentiful supply would encourage greater gas usage and distribution into new areas that currently don&#039;t have gas service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim<br />
How about the pipeline companies that transport natural gas. I would think a plentiful supply would encourage greater gas usage and distribution into new areas that currently don&#8217;t have gas service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/11 queries in 0.487 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 345/345 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: static.jubakpicks.com

Served from: jubakpicks.com @ 2012-05-17 15:21:55 -->
